+213.9%
NRG vs TMF
-42.1%
+255.9%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.6% | -1.7% | -1.9% | -3.4% |
| 7D | +3.9% | -0.9% | +4.7% | +3.9% |
| 30D | -3.0% | -1.0% | -2.0% | -2.9% |
| 3M | -10.9% | -11.3% | +0.4% | -10.1% |
| 6M | -25.3% | -22.7% | -2.6% | -24.2% |
| YTD | -26.8% | -17.3% | -9.5% | -25.9% |
| 1Y | -23.3% | -22.5% | -0.8% | -22.2% |
| All | +213.9% | -42.1% | +255.9% | +211.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling