+208.7%
NRG vs PTEN
-3.7%
+212.4%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PTEN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | -0.4% | +2.0% | +1.7% |
| 7D | -4.7% | +3.5% | -8.1% | -5.3% |
| 30D | -6.0% | +17.5% | -23.5% | -9.1% |
| 3M | -8.0% | +12.7% | -20.7% | -10.8% |
| 6M | -23.2% | +33.1% | -56.2% | -29.5% |
| YTD | -28.1% | +116.4% | -144.5% | -42.5% |
| 1Y | -27.3% | +141.2% | -168.4% | -44.2% |
| 3Y | +208.7% | -3.8% | +212.4% | +179.9% |
| All | +208.7% | -3.7% | +212.4% | +179.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PTEN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PTEN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PTEN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PTEN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling