+208.7%
NRG vs PHM
+49.3%
+159.3%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PHM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -4.7% | -5.0% | +0.3% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -8.4% | +2.5% | -3.7% |
| 3M | -8.0% | -4.4% | -3.5% | -7.3% |
| 6M | -23.2% | -3.7% | -19.4% | -23.0% |
| YTD | -28.1% | +1.3% | -29.3% | -28.8% |
| 1Y | -27.3% | -14.0% | -13.2% | -25.2% |
| 3Y | +208.7% | +48.1% | +160.5% | +154.3% |
| All | +208.7% | +49.3% | +159.3% | +154.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PHM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PHM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PHM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PHM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling