+216.7%
NRG vs GFS
0.0%
+216.6%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GFS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +2.2% | -0.5% | +1.2% |
| 7D | -4.7% | +3.8% | -8.5% | -5.4% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -11.7% | +5.7% | -3.6% |
| 3M | -8.0% | -41.8% | +33.8% | +1.7% |
| 6M | -23.2% | +6.6% | -29.8% | -25.3% |
| YTD | -28.1% | +34.6% | -62.7% | -33.4% |
| 1Y | -27.3% | +46.2% | -73.4% | -33.8% |
| 3Y | +208.7% | -20.3% | +229.0% | +199.5% |
| All | +216.7% | 0.0% | +216.6% | +197.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling