+193.5%
NRG vs CTAS
+107.2%
+86.2%
-40.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | CTAS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.6% | +1.5% | +0.1% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -4.7% | +0.5% | -5.2% | -4.9% |
| 30D | -6.0% | -0.7% | -5.2% | -5.7% |
| 3M | -8.0% | +11.1% | -19.0% | -13.1% |
| 6M | -23.2% | +2.1% | -25.3% | -24.7% |
| YTD | -28.1% | +8.0% | -36.0% | -31.6% |
| 1Y | -27.3% | -0.5% | -26.8% | -28.1% |
| 3Y | +208.7% | +66.2% | +142.4% | +128.0% |
| All | +193.5% | +107.2% | +86.2% | +85.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CTAS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CTAS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CTAS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CTAS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling