+140.9%
NOK vs ZTS
-50.3%
+191.3%
-50.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZTS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.8% | +0.2% | +4.7% | +4.8% |
| 7D | +11.0% | -3.7% | +14.7% | +10.8% |
| 30D | +7.8% | -0.8% | +8.6% | +7.8% |
| 3M | -21.0% | -9.7% | -11.3% | -20.4% |
| 6M | +40.9% | -38.4% | +79.3% | +56.3% |
| YTD | +72.0% | -41.1% | +113.1% | +92.2% |
| 1Y | +140.9% | -50.6% | +191.5% | +177.1% |
| All | +140.9% | -50.3% | +191.3% | +177.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZTS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZTS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZTS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZTS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling