+147.0%
NOK vs ECHO
+900.0%
-753.0%
-55.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ECHO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +1.9% | -4.4% | -2.7% |
| 7D | +5.4% | +5.7% | -0.3% | +4.9% |
| 30D | -14.1% | +13.8% | -28.0% | -14.9% |
| 3M | -23.6% | +9.1% | -32.7% | -24.0% |
| 6M | -45.1% | -24.9% | -20.2% | -44.6% |
| YTD | +24.7% | -8.0% | +32.7% | +24.7% |
| 1Y | +19.0% | +42.9% | -23.9% | +16.7% |
| 3Y | +147.0% | +926.7% | -779.7% | +85.6% |
| All | +147.0% | +900.0% | -753.0% | +85.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ECHO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ECHO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ECHO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ECHO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling