-9.5%
NOC vs ZM
+13.6%
-23.2%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +0.1% | -0.1% | 0.0% |
| 7D | +0.8% | -5.7% | +6.5% | +0.4% |
| 30D | -9.7% | -9.1% | -0.6% | -10.1% |
| 3M | -5.6% | +3.5% | -9.2% | -5.5% |
| 6M | -28.6% | +25.7% | -54.2% | -28.2% |
| YTD | -7.9% | +10.8% | -18.6% | -7.7% |
| 1Y | -9.5% | +12.8% | -22.3% | -9.7% |
| All | -9.5% | +13.6% | -23.2% | -9.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling