+17.7%
NOC vs PSKY
-39.6%
+57.3%
-24.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | PSKY | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.0% | -4.8% | +8.9% | +4.1% |
| 7D | +8.1% | -24.6% | +32.7% | +8.5% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -36.1% | +34.7% | -0.8% |
| 3M | -5.4% | -54.8% | +49.4% | -4.5% |
| 6M | -5.4% | -54.8% | +49.4% | -4.5% |
| YTD | -5.4% | -54.8% | +49.4% | -4.5% |
| 1Y | -11.8% | -58.4% | +46.6% | -10.9% |
| All | +17.7% | -39.6% | +57.3% | +17.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside PSKY.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus PSKY return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × PSKY return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded PSKY wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling