+28.4%
NOC vs LNT
+46.9%
-18.5%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LNT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +0.7% | -0.9% | +1.6% | +1.0% |
| 7D | -1.8% | -1.1% | -0.7% | -1.4% |
| 30D | -9.4% | -1.9% | -7.5% | -8.8% |
| 3M | -3.8% | -7.2% | +3.3% | -1.4% |
| 6M | -28.8% | -3.9% | -24.9% | -27.8% |
| YTD | -7.9% | +5.9% | -13.7% | -9.5% |
| 1Y | -9.0% | +8.4% | -17.4% | -11.2% |
| All | +28.4% | +46.9% | -18.5% | +16.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LNT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LNT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LNT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LNT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling