+27.5%
NOC vs LH
+63.5%
-36.0%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | LH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | -1.2% | +0.6% | -0.4% |
| 7D | -1.6% | -3.2% | +1.6% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -10.4% | +0.1% | -10.5% | -10.4% |
| 3M | -5.6% | +18.6% | -24.2% | -8.1% |
| 6M | -30.4% | +17.9% | -48.3% | -32.2% |
| YTD | -8.5% | +28.9% | -37.4% | -12.1% |
| 1Y | -8.3% | +16.6% | -25.0% | -10.9% |
| All | +27.5% | +63.5% | -36.0% | +19.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside LH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus LH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × LH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded LH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling