+43.2%
NOC vs GTLB
-47.1%
+90.4%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | GTLB | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | +1.1% | -3.6% | -2.5% |
| 7D | -5.2% | +11.1% | -16.2% | -5.1% |
| 30D | -7.2% | +37.8% | -45.0% | -7.1% |
| 3M | -5.1% | +61.6% | -66.7% | -4.9% |
| 6M | -31.1% | +98.9% | -130.0% | -30.8% |
| YTD | -8.6% | +32.8% | -41.4% | -8.4% |
| 1Y | -9.7% | +14.7% | -24.4% | -9.6% |
| 3Y | +24.3% | +1.3% | +22.9% | +24.4% |
| All | +43.2% | -47.1% | +90.4% | +44.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GTLB.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GTLB return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GTLB return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GTLB wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling