+25.6%
NOC vs GLDM
+128.8%
-103.2%
-35.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GLDM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.5% | -0.9% | -1.6% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -5.2% | -0.5% | -4.6% | -5.1% |
| 30D | -7.2% | +4.4% | -11.6% | -8.3% |
| 3M | -5.1% | -1.1% | -4.0% | -5.1% |
| 6M | -31.1% | -13.7% | -17.4% | -28.9% |
| YTD | -8.6% | +2.8% | -11.3% | -9.9% |
| 1Y | -9.7% | +24.8% | -34.6% | -15.6% |
| All | +25.6% | +128.8% | -103.2% | -13.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GLDM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GLDM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GLDM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GLDM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling