-33.2%
NIO vs ZCMD
-75.3%
+42.1%
-33.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ZCMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -3.7% | +2.2% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -13.0% | -8.0% | -5.0% | -13.0% |
| 30D | -18.3% | -27.9% | +9.6% | -18.1% |
| 3M | -33.2% | -74.6% | +41.4% | -32.6% |
| All | -33.2% | -75.3% | +42.1% | -32.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZCMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZCMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZCMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZCMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · Available span rolling