-37.4%
NIO vs UMAC
+138.6%
-176.1%
-54.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMAC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -3.2% | 0.0% | -3.0% |
| 7D | -7.3% | -4.0% | -3.3% | -7.0% |
| 30D | -22.5% | -9.4% | -13.1% | -22.4% |
| 3M | -30.9% | +3.0% | -33.9% | -31.8% |
| 6M | -37.2% | +27.2% | -64.4% | -40.9% |
| YTD | -29.8% | +84.7% | -114.5% | -36.5% |
| 1Y | -37.4% | +136.5% | -173.9% | -42.3% |
| All | -37.4% | +138.6% | -176.1% | -42.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMAC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMAC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMAC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMAC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling