-53.5%
NIO vs KMX
+55.6%
-109.1%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | KMX | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | +1.2% | -6.1% | -4.9% |
| 7D | -14.5% | +3.4% | -17.8% | -14.5% |
| 30D | -15.0% | +6.8% | -21.8% | -14.9% |
| 3M | -35.6% | -11.4% | -24.2% | -35.6% |
| 6M | -55.7% | +43.6% | -99.2% | -55.8% |
| YTD | -43.1% | +37.7% | -80.9% | -43.6% |
| 1Y | -53.5% | +53.0% | -106.5% | -55.0% |
| All | -53.5% | +55.6% | -109.1% | -55.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KMX.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KMX return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KMX return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KMX wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling