-64.8%
NIO vs KIM
+46.3%
-111.1%
-71.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | KIM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.2% | -1.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -13.0% | +0.4% | -13.5% | -13.2% |
| 30D | -18.3% | -4.0% | -14.3% | -16.8% |
| 3M | -33.2% | +0.5% | -33.8% | -33.9% |
| 6M | -21.5% | +3.6% | -25.1% | -23.7% |
| YTD | -25.5% | +20.4% | -45.9% | -33.1% |
| 1Y | -38.0% | +9.7% | -47.7% | -41.7% |
| All | -64.8% | +46.3% | -111.1% | -73.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KIM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KIM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KIM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KIM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling