-64.2%
NIO vs INVH
-7.6%
-56.6%
-70.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | INVH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -0.1% | -2.2% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -4.1% | -2.3% | -1.9% | -3.4% |
| 30D | -23.2% | -5.7% | -17.5% | -21.7% |
| 3M | -29.9% | -4.5% | -25.5% | -29.0% |
| 6M | -25.1% | +11.0% | -36.1% | -29.2% |
| YTD | -27.5% | +3.7% | -31.1% | -29.6% |
| 1Y | -41.1% | -2.8% | -38.2% | -41.1% |
| All | -64.2% | -7.6% | -56.6% | -63.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside INVH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus INVH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × INVH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded INVH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling