-64.8%
NIO vs GPC
-1.1%
-63.8%
-71.0%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GPC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | +1.1% | -2.7% | -1.7% |
| 7D | -13.0% | +1.2% | -14.2% | -13.2% |
| 30D | -18.3% | +6.0% | -24.2% | -19.0% |
| 3M | -33.2% | +42.6% | -75.8% | -37.8% |
| 6M | -21.5% | +22.8% | -44.2% | -24.8% |
| YTD | -25.5% | +15.5% | -40.9% | -28.2% |
| 1Y | -38.0% | +2.0% | -40.1% | -38.2% |
| All | -64.8% | -1.1% | -63.8% | -68.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GPC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GPC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GPC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GPC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling