-65.3%
NIO vs GFI
+292.6%
-358.0%
-70.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GFI | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.2% | -2.9% | -0.4% | -2.8% |
| 7D | -7.3% | -5.1% | -2.1% | -6.5% |
| 30D | -22.5% | +13.4% | -35.9% | -24.0% |
| 3M | -30.9% | +36.2% | -67.1% | -34.4% |
| 6M | -37.2% | -9.8% | -27.4% | -36.8% |
| YTD | -29.8% | +7.7% | -37.5% | -31.8% |
| 1Y | -37.4% | +27.2% | -64.6% | -41.2% |
| All | -65.3% | +292.6% | -358.0% | -76.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GFI.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GFI return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GFI return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GFI wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling