-39.0%
NIO vs FIGR
+5.9%
-44.9%
-53.1%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 10y.
| Period | Portfolio | FIGR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.4% | -0.4% | -2.0% | -2.3% |
| 7D | -4.1% | +14.9% | -19.0% | -5.8% |
| 30D | -23.2% | +32.3% | -55.5% | -25.9% |
| 3M | -29.9% | +34.8% | -64.7% | -32.9% |
| 6M | -25.1% | +16.8% | -41.9% | -27.4% |
| YTD | -27.5% | -6.7% | -20.8% | -31.8% |
| All | -39.0% | +5.9% | -44.9% | -44.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FIGR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FIGR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FIGR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 10y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FIGR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
10y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling