-48.6%
NIO vs FBTC
+65.3%
-113.9%
-57.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | FBTC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -2.5% | +1.0% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -13.0% | +2.9% | -16.0% | -13.6% |
| 30D | -18.3% | +23.0% | -41.3% | -22.2% |
| 3M | -33.2% | +25.6% | -58.8% | -36.8% |
| 6M | -21.5% | +9.0% | -30.5% | -23.5% |
| YTD | -25.5% | -8.9% | -16.5% | -25.1% |
| 1Y | -38.0% | -27.5% | -10.5% | -34.3% |
| All | -48.6% | +65.3% | -113.9% | -59.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside FBTC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus FBTC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × FBTC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded FBTC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling