-54.6%
NIO vs DUOL
-24.3%
-30.2%
-66.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | DUOL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | +1.6% | -5.4% | -4.0% |
| 7D | +2.8% | +22.4% | -19.6% | -0.2% |
| 30D | -8.4% | +4.5% | -12.9% | -9.3% |
| 3M | -32.0% | +14.2% | -46.1% | -33.8% |
| 6M | -43.9% | +45.1% | -89.0% | -47.7% |
| YTD | -35.7% | -10.7% | -25.0% | -35.6% |
| 1Y | -51.1% | -18.7% | -32.4% | -50.3% |
| All | -54.6% | -24.3% | -30.2% | -57.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside DUOL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus DUOL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × DUOL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded DUOL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling