-51.1%
NIO vs CLBK
+63.3%
-114.5%
-53.6%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | CLBK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -0.2% | -3.6% | -3.8% |
| 7D | +2.8% | +2.4% | +0.4% | +3.3% |
| 30D | -8.4% | +4.9% | -13.3% | -7.5% |
| 3M | -32.0% | +5.3% | -37.2% | -31.2% |
| 6M | -43.9% | +28.3% | -72.3% | -41.6% |
| YTD | -35.7% | +61.1% | -96.8% | -31.2% |
| 1Y | -51.1% | +62.4% | -113.5% | -47.7% |
| All | -51.1% | +63.3% | -114.5% | -47.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside CLBK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus CLBK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × CLBK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded CLBK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling