-64.3%
NIO vs BBIO
+154.4%
-218.7%
-70.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | BBIO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.1% | -0.1% | +3.2% | +3.1% |
| 7D | -2.9% | -3.2% | +0.3% | -2.1% |
| 30D | -18.7% | -13.6% | -5.1% | -15.9% |
| 3M | -29.4% | +7.2% | -36.7% | -31.3% |
| 6M | -32.5% | +1.5% | -34.0% | -33.6% |
| YTD | -27.6% | -5.3% | -22.4% | -28.2% |
| 1Y | -39.2% | +37.7% | -76.9% | -45.5% |
| 3Y | -64.3% | +153.9% | -218.2% | -76.2% |
| All | -64.3% | +154.4% | -218.7% | -76.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside BBIO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus BBIO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × BBIO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded BBIO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling