-53.5%
NIO vs ARWR
+17.3%
-70.9%
-57.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARWR | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -4.9% | +1.3% | -6.3% | -5.0% |
| 7D | -14.5% | -17.8% | +3.4% | -14.0% |
| 30D | -15.0% | -18.1% | +3.2% | -14.4% |
| 3M | -35.6% | -44.2% | +8.6% | -34.7% |
| 6M | -55.7% | -38.6% | -17.0% | -55.0% |
| YTD | -43.1% | -28.0% | -15.1% | -42.9% |
| 1Y | -53.5% | +16.1% | -69.7% | -53.4% |
| All | -53.5% | +17.3% | -70.9% | -53.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARWR.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARWR return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARWR return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARWR wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling