-54.7%
NIO vs ARMK
+100.8%
-155.5%
-66.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -3.8% | -0.9% | -2.9% | -3.6% |
| 7D | +2.8% | -0.7% | +3.5% | +2.9% |
| 30D | -8.4% | -1.3% | -7.1% | -8.2% |
| 3M | -32.0% | -2.5% | -29.5% | -31.8% |
| 6M | -43.9% | +20.8% | -64.7% | -47.2% |
| YTD | -35.7% | +48.2% | -83.9% | -42.7% |
| 1Y | -51.1% | +45.7% | -96.9% | -56.3% |
| 3Y | -54.7% | +96.6% | -151.3% | -62.6% |
| All | -54.7% | +100.8% | -155.5% | -62.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling