-38.0%
NIO vs ARMK
+47.4%
-85.4%
-51.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.9% | -0.7% | -1.4% |
| 7D | -13.0% | -2.4% | -10.6% | -12.7% |
| 30D | -18.3% | 0.0% | -18.3% | -18.2% |
| 3M | -33.2% | +6.7% | -39.9% | -34.3% |
| 6M | -21.5% | +38.8% | -60.3% | -26.7% |
| YTD | -25.5% | +55.2% | -80.7% | -27.8% |
| 1Y | -38.0% | +46.6% | -84.6% | -39.5% |
| All | -38.0% | +47.4% | -85.4% | -39.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling