-53.9%
NIO vs ARMK
+41.1%
-95.0%
-56.2%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ARMK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +3.4% | -4.2% | +7.6% | +4.4% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -5.8% | +5.2% | +0.7% |
| 30D | -3.5% | -5.3% | +1.7% | -2.4% |
| 3M | -30.7% | -6.7% | -23.9% | -29.6% |
| 6M | -45.6% | +17.4% | -63.0% | -48.8% |
| YTD | -35.3% | +43.0% | -78.3% | -39.9% |
| 1Y | -53.9% | +40.3% | -94.2% | -57.3% |
| All | -53.9% | +41.1% | -95.0% | -57.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ARMK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ARMK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ARMK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ARMK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling