-21.5%
NIO vs ACM
-30.5%
+9.0%
-44.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | ACM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.6% | -0.4% | -1.2% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -13.0% | -3.7% | -9.3% | -12.8% |
| 30D | -18.3% | -11.1% | -7.2% | -17.3% |
| 3M | -33.2% | -8.0% | -25.2% | -32.5% |
| 6M | -21.5% | -29.7% | +8.2% | -15.1% |
| All | -21.5% | -30.5% | +9.0% | -15.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ACM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ACM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ACM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ACM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling