-57.5%
NIO vs ABCL
+156.0%
-213.5%
-66.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ABCL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +5.9% | +6.7% | -0.8% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +5.6% | -3.2% | +8.8% | +6.0% |
| 30D | -4.2% | -7.4% | +3.2% | -3.2% |
| 3M | -26.3% | +81.9% | -108.2% | -36.2% |
| 6M | -42.5% | +135.7% | -178.3% | -54.2% |
| YTD | -33.5% | +247.4% | -280.9% | -53.1% |
| 1Y | -52.7% | +162.3% | -214.9% | -64.1% |
| 3Y | -57.5% | +165.5% | -222.9% | -68.0% |
| All | -57.5% | +156.0% | -213.5% | -68.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ABCL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ABCL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ABCL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ABCL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling