+67.9%
NI vs ULTA
+31.2%
+36.6%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ULTA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +2.1% | -2.1% | -0.2% |
| 7D | 0.0% | -3.1% | +3.1% | +0.2% |
| 30D | -1.4% | +2.8% | -4.2% | -1.6% |
| 3M | -10.6% | +14.8% | -25.3% | -11.5% |
| 6M | -9.3% | -16.2% | +6.9% | -8.6% |
| YTD | +1.1% | -9.6% | +10.8% | +1.3% |
| 1Y | +3.4% | +4.8% | -1.4% | +2.3% |
| 3Y | +67.9% | +30.7% | +37.2% | +52.7% |
| All | +67.9% | +31.2% | +36.6% | +52.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ULTA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ULTA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ULTA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ULTA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling