+70.6%
NI vs TXT
+5.7%
+64.9%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TXT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | +0.6% | +0.6% | +1.1% |
| 7D | +2.3% | -0.2% | +2.5% | +2.3% |
| 30D | -1.7% | -11.1% | +9.4% | +0.4% |
| 3M | -8.0% | -13.0% | +5.0% | -5.9% |
| 6M | -8.6% | -16.2% | +7.6% | -6.0% |
| YTD | +2.3% | -8.7% | +11.1% | +3.4% |
| 1Y | +6.9% | -3.8% | +10.7% | +6.8% |
| 3Y | +70.6% | +5.5% | +65.0% | +57.2% |
| All | +70.6% | +5.7% | +64.9% | +57.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TXT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TXT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TXT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TXT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling