+22.2%
NI vs MULL
+2,481.0%
-2,458.8%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | MULL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.2% | -3.0% | +4.2% | +1.3% |
| 7D | +2.3% | +14.0% | -11.7% | +2.1% |
| 30D | -1.7% | +24.8% | -26.5% | -2.1% |
| 3M | -8.0% | -16.1% | +8.1% | -8.5% |
| 6M | -8.6% | +330.9% | -339.5% | -13.8% |
| YTD | +2.3% | +545.0% | -542.7% | -5.4% |
| 1Y | +6.9% | +2,427.1% | -2,420.2% | -6.7% |
| All | +22.2% | +2,481.0% | -2,458.8% | +2.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside MULL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus MULL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × MULL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded MULL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling