+67.9%
NI vs KEEL
+197.5%
-129.6%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | KEEL | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | +3.8% | -3.8% | -0.1% |
| 7D | 0.0% | +2.9% | -2.8% | 0.0% |
| 30D | -1.4% | +0.8% | -2.2% | -1.5% |
| 3M | -10.6% | -35.3% | +24.7% | -10.1% |
| 6M | -9.3% | +59.4% | -68.7% | -10.8% |
| YTD | +1.1% | +51.9% | -50.8% | -0.7% |
| 1Y | +3.4% | +75.0% | -71.6% | +0.8% |
| 3Y | +67.9% | +224.5% | -156.7% | +58.7% |
| All | +67.9% | +197.5% | -129.6% | +58.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside KEEL.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus KEEL return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × KEEL return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded KEEL wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling