+67.9%
NI vs GRMN
+179.1%
-111.2%
-16.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | GRMN | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -0.6% | 0.0% | -0.6% | -0.6% |
| 7D | -0.6% | -1.8% | +1.2% | -0.4% |
| 30D | -1.4% | -12.1% | +10.7% | +0.2% |
| 3M | -10.6% | +18.0% | -28.6% | -12.8% |
| 6M | -9.9% | +13.7% | -23.6% | -11.9% |
| YTD | +1.2% | +35.3% | -34.1% | -4.0% |
| 1Y | +4.4% | +17.2% | -12.8% | +1.4% |
| All | +67.9% | +179.1% | -111.2% | +31.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside GRMN.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus GRMN return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × GRMN return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded GRMN wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling