+113.4%
NHPAP vs VOO
+77.0%
+36.4%
-34.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | VOO | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.5% | +0.5% | +0.1% |
| 7D | +8.7% | +2.6% | +6.1% | +8.0% |
| 30D | +8.7% | +2.6% | +6.1% | +8.0% |
| 3M | +15.0% | +3.7% | +11.3% | +13.9% |
| 6M | +37.1% | +13.0% | +24.1% | +32.7% |
| YTD | +41.0% | +12.4% | +28.6% | +36.6% |
| 1Y | +53.4% | +18.6% | +34.8% | +46.3% |
| All | +113.4% | +77.0% | +36.4% | +62.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VOO.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VOO return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VOO return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VOO wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling