-39.1%
NFLX vs ZM
+12.1%
-51.1%
-45.8%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | 0.0% | -0.7% | +0.7% | 0.0% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -2.7% | -5.3% | -7.9% |
| 30D | +1.6% | -10.0% | +11.6% | +2.3% |
| 3M | -7.3% | +1.6% | -8.9% | -7.7% |
| 6M | -21.6% | +25.0% | -46.6% | -22.6% |
| YTD | -18.9% | +10.6% | -29.6% | -19.3% |
| 1Y | -39.1% | +14.0% | -53.0% | -39.5% |
| All | -39.1% | +12.1% | -51.1% | -39.5% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling