-39.3%
NFLX vs ZM
+8.0%
-47.3%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZM | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | 0.0% | +4.7% | +4.7% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -8.4% | +15.5% | +7.5% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -1.9% | +0.3% | -1.7% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -10.1% | +0.3% | -9.4% |
| 6M | -27.1% | -13.9% | -13.2% | -27.5% |
| YTD | -29.2% | +6.4% | -35.6% | -28.9% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | +9.6% | -48.8% | -38.7% |
| All | -39.3% | +8.0% | -47.3% | -38.7% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZM.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZM return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZM return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZM wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling