+41.0%
NFLX vs ZETA
+356.2%
-315.2%
-53.7%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -2.9% | -1.2% | -1.6% | -2.7% |
| 7D | -4.4% | +26.5% | -30.8% | -6.8% |
| 30D | -11.0% | +10.3% | -21.3% | -12.1% |
| 3M | -15.5% | +30.5% | -46.1% | -18.1% |
| 6M | -28.5% | +129.4% | -157.8% | -35.1% |
| YTD | -33.1% | +83.1% | -116.3% | -38.4% |
| 1Y | -45.8% | +82.1% | -127.9% | -50.2% |
| All | +41.0% | +356.2% | -315.2% | +2.1% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling