-39.3%
NFLX vs ZETA
+84.8%
-124.0%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZETA | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | +2.6% | +2.1% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -5.0% | +12.1% | +7.6% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -3.3% | +1.7% | -1.4% |
| 3M | -9.8% | +31.0% | -40.8% | -12.1% |
| 6M | -27.1% | +72.2% | -99.2% | -30.9% |
| YTD | -29.2% | +56.2% | -85.4% | -34.0% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | +90.3% | -129.6% | -43.9% |
| All | -39.3% | +84.8% | -124.0% | -43.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZETA.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZETA return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZETA return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZETA wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling