+70.7%
NFLX vs ZBH
-19.7%
+90.5%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | ZBH | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | +0.4% | -1.4% | -1.0% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -4.9% | -3.2% | -7.9% |
| 30D | -0.3% | -3.2% | +2.9% | -0.2% |
| 3M | -6.6% | +5.8% | -12.4% | -6.5% |
| 6M | -22.7% | +2.0% | -24.6% | -22.8% |
| YTD | -18.9% | +5.8% | -24.7% | -19.1% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | -7.9% | -31.9% | -40.0% |
| All | +70.7% | -19.7% | +90.5% | +74.2% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside ZBH.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus ZBH return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × ZBH return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded ZBH wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling