+31.3%
NFLX vs XLF
+65.0%
-33.6%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | XLF | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +1.8% | +0.7% | +1.2% | +1.3% |
| 7D | -1.1% | -1.5% | +0.4% | +0.1% |
| 30D | +4.3% | -1.2% | +5.5% | +5.4% |
| 3M | -4.8% | +9.2% | -13.9% | -11.3% |
| 6M | -18.4% | +16.3% | -34.8% | -28.1% |
| YTD | -17.4% | +5.4% | -22.9% | -21.3% |
| 1Y | -35.7% | +7.6% | -43.3% | -39.9% |
| 3Y | +73.8% | +74.2% | -0.4% | +0.5% |
| All | +31.3% | +65.0% | -33.6% | -21.6% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside XLF.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus XLF return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × XLF return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded XLF wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling