+41.8%
NFLX vs VIK
+228.1%
-186.3%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | VIK | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +0.3% | -5.6% | -5.4% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -3.0% | -1.2% | -3.8% |
| 30D | +5.5% | -20.7% | +26.2% | +9.1% |
| 3M | -4.1% | -4.6% | +0.6% | -3.9% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +14.0% | -34.7% | -23.6% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +20.2% | -36.7% | -20.7% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +36.0% | -73.8% | -42.9% |
| All | +41.8% | +228.1% | -186.3% | +6.8% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside VIK.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus VIK return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × VIK return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded VIK wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling