-21.9%
NFLX vs UMC
+136.5%
-158.4%
-37.3%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 6mo.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | +5.1% | -6.9% | -1.3% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +6.6% | -11.6% | -4.2% |
| 30D | +3.5% | +16.6% | -13.0% | +5.5% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +11.0% | -18.1% | -6.1% |
| All | -21.9% | +136.5% | -158.4% | -10.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 6mo: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
6mo analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling