-39.3%
NFLX vs UMC
+112.5%
-151.8%
-46.4%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | +4.7% | -2.1% | +6.8% | +4.5% |
| 7D | +7.1% | -14.7% | +21.8% | +5.6% |
| 30D | -1.6% | -32.9% | +31.2% | -5.0% |
| 3M | -9.8% | -22.2% | +12.4% | -11.4% |
| 6M | -27.1% | +25.9% | -53.0% | -26.1% |
| YTD | -29.2% | +107.9% | -137.1% | -27.4% |
| 1Y | -39.3% | +115.0% | -154.3% | -38.0% |
| All | -39.3% | +112.5% | -151.8% | -38.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling