-37.8%
NFLX vs UMC
+209.4%
-247.2%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | UMC | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | +4.6% | -9.9% | -5.0% |
| 7D | -4.2% | +5.0% | -9.2% | -3.9% |
| 30D | +5.5% | +7.7% | -2.2% | +6.1% |
| 3M | -4.1% | +1.7% | -5.7% | -4.2% |
| 6M | -20.7% | +113.9% | -134.6% | -19.0% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +168.9% | -185.4% | -17.3% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | +207.2% | -245.0% | -41.9% |
| All | -37.8% | +209.4% | -247.2% | -41.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside UMC.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus UMC return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × UMC return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded UMC wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling