+70.7%
NFLX vs TRGP
+261.7%
-191.0%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | TRGP | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.0% | -1.0% | 0.0% | -0.8% |
| 7D | -8.1% | -0.7% | -7.4% | -8.0% |
| 30D | -0.3% | +9.5% | -9.8% | -1.9% |
| 3M | -6.6% | +10.8% | -17.4% | -8.6% |
| 6M | -22.7% | +25.3% | -48.0% | -26.3% |
| YTD | -18.9% | +60.3% | -79.2% | -26.3% |
| 1Y | -39.8% | +84.6% | -124.4% | -47.2% |
| All | +70.7% | +261.7% | -191.0% | +38.4% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TRGP.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TRGP return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TRGP return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TRGP wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling