-38.3%
NFLX vs TMUS
-23.1%
-15.3%
-46.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 1y.
| Period | Portfolio | TMUS | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | +0.1% | -2.0% | -1.9% |
| 7D | -5.0% | -0.3% | -4.7% | -4.9% |
| 30D | +3.5% | +3.1% | +0.4% | +3.2% |
| 3M | -7.1% | +2.4% | -9.5% | -8.0% |
| 6M | -22.5% | -17.1% | -5.4% | -22.2% |
| YTD | -18.1% | -9.1% | -9.0% | -17.8% |
| 1Y | -38.3% | -23.6% | -14.7% | -35.3% |
| All | -38.3% | -23.1% | -15.3% | -35.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside TMUS.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus TMUS return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × TMUS return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 1y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded TMUS wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
1y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling