+76.6%
NFLX vs T
+106.0%
-29.5%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 3y.
| Period | Portfolio | T | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -5.3% | -1.9% | -3.4% | -5.1% |
| 7D | -4.2% | -1.3% | -3.0% | -4.1% |
| 30D | +5.5% | +11.4% | -5.9% | +4.1% |
| 3M | -4.1% | +14.3% | -18.3% | -5.6% |
| 6M | -20.7% | -9.3% | -11.4% | -20.3% |
| YTD | -16.5% | +7.1% | -23.6% | -17.6% |
| 1Y | -37.8% | -9.1% | -28.7% | -37.6% |
| All | +76.6% | +106.0% | -29.5% | +48.3% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside T.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus T return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × T return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 3y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded T wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
3y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling