-3.8%
NFLX vs RMD
-5.8%
+2.0%
-75.9%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for 5y.
| Period | Portfolio | RMD | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.1% | -0.7% | -0.4% | -0.9% |
| 7D | -0.3% | +3.1% | -3.3% | -1.1% |
| 30D | -10.0% | +1.8% | -11.8% | -10.7% |
| 3M | -17.1% | +6.7% | -23.8% | -18.9% |
| 6M | -27.7% | +13.9% | -41.6% | -31.0% |
| YTD | -32.5% | -2.0% | -30.5% | -32.9% |
| 1Y | -43.5% | -5.4% | -38.1% | -43.3% |
| 3Y | +41.4% | +67.4% | -25.9% | +7.7% |
| All | -3.8% | -5.8% | +2.0% | -12.0% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RMD.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RMD return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RMD return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over 5y: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RMD wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
5y analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling