+23.3%
NFLX vs RDDT
+217.8%
-194.5%
-49.5%
Performance
Returns, benchmark comparison, and relative performance.
Performance by timeframe
Returns for all.
| Period | Portfolio | RDDT | Excess | Alpha |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1D | -1.9% | -3.3% | +1.4% | -1.5% |
| 7D | -5.0% | +3.3% | -8.3% | -5.4% |
| 30D | +3.5% | -7.6% | +11.2% | +4.3% |
| 3M | -7.1% | -12.7% | +5.6% | -6.5% |
| 6M | -22.5% | +7.2% | -29.6% | -24.2% |
| YTD | -18.1% | -35.0% | +16.9% | -15.7% |
| 1Y | -38.3% | -35.0% | -3.3% | -36.9% |
| All | +23.3% | +217.8% | -194.5% | +5.9% |
Cumulative growth
Daily Returns
Daily percentage return beside RDDT.
Daily Out/Under-Performance
Portfolio return minus RDDT return. Positive bars indicate outperformance.
Daily Alpha
Portfolio daily return minus β × RDDT return. Early observations use the first valid beta; later observations use the trailing beta estimated for each date.
Cumulative Out/Under-Performance
Relative wealth over all: compounded portfolio wealth divided by compounded RDDT wealth, less one. Both series rebase at the selected span's start.
Cumulative Alpha
Compounded beta-adjusted residual returns apply the first valid beta to early observations, then the trailing beta ending on each date.
Updating return analytics…
all analysis · Full analysis span regression · 6 months rolling